Showing posts with label Theocracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theocracy. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 8, 2008

New Hampshire Shit Show


Well, at least by the end of the day we will stop hearing about how important New Hampshire is in the big scheme of things and break it all down on what all these crazy votes mean. I think the one reason I tend to only read bloggers when it comes to political information is that the rabid ass monkeys at the networks wouldn't know their own ass from a hole in the moon if you shot them up there on Voyager 2.

I mean the political commentary is only barely tolerable on certain websites and a few radio stations. The rest of them are a bunch of survived afterbirths who suck at the corporate tit like a starving child in some third world hell hole. With the exception of true visionaries (Olbermann, Colbert, Stewart) who has the god damn decency to either say exactly what they feel or mock the ridiculous shit we're shoved everyday; the rest of the "political punditry" have as much at stake here as the candidates do.

I swear that this cycle of media, lobbyists and politics is getting more entwined then a Roman Bath House under Caligula's rule. They push on us Shrillary, Magical Underwear Express, Mr. 9/11 Pathological Cheater, and "the clean black man" while giving no time to any candidate who radically wants the change the way things are done. They routinely lie out of their ass like they were all born from some sex crazed night between Richard Nixon and Rafael Palmeiro. CityCat has been on the stump about how pointless and inane pre-game shows in football and that the shit show on the television about politics are the same, and I believe and agree with my beautiful future wife.

The image above was chosen because that is how I feel the giant pool of miscreants who are your typical voter on the right side actually are. Do you honestly want me to believe you honestly think HuckAChuck is the best option for this country? I'm sorry I wasn't a big fan of the Spanish Inquisition the first time around jackass. It's folks like this that the worst creation in television history, The Fox News Channel, exists and isn't going anywhere fast.

The amount of sewage the spew every hour on the hour that would keep Yeomets full on a constant basis. They have personally been driving the wedge between this country with a hammer on a daily basis since they crept out of whatever sixth layer of hell it was conceived. This country, more now then ever, must come together and rise as one, but these fascist collie fuckers have their goals and are doing their best to achieve them. I know it's said that it's good to have goals, but pedophiles have goals too and their achievement isn't exactly a blessing for mankind either.

One day, and I hope it isn't too soon, this country is going to splinter and it will be because of these cross wearing, bible thumping, heathen burning lunatics who have this crazy notion that a nation created by people who were escaping religious prosecution wanted this place to be a theocracy. It is supposed to be one nation under God, not THE God, or Jesus God, or Allah, Zeus, Odin or Cthulhu. The God is an all encompassing God, an adjective describing whatever faith you wish to believe in.

The day may be coming where it is us, the folks who have a level head who want this country to progress against those who wish us to become a theocracy with prayer every hour on the hour, becoming what they crusade against this very moment in a far away land. I just know that if it comes down to it, it will be the end of this great nation as we know it.

Well, the first primary is today in New Hampshire, enjoy the punditry.

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Values Voters Assemble!



Our favorite vidblogger Max Blumethal got into the Values Voters conference here in DC and interview some of the folks. Watching this video I did learn a few key things I did not know before.



1. Homosexuality is merely a pathological disorder linked to gender confusion and can hit you at any time, any place.
2. According to Mormons, Jesus and Satan are brothers.
3. Banning abortion would end our illegal immigration problem cause as we all know, those aborted babies could have been our day laborers
4. The abortion ruling was a holocaust
5. Abortion is the leading cause of death among African American women between the ages of 25 and 34
6. By not being bigoted and not being racist, [George W.] Bush has embraced Islamofascists on several occasions

These are the people I fear most in this country. Not terrorists or corporations, no it's the bible thumping technocrats who wish to make this land of freedom exactly like the place they hate the most.

Friday, September 28, 2007

Example of the Front Lines


As you know I have been on the front lines of the GoE doing some investigative reporting. The following is a transcript of my latest post in a thread about the growing threat of theocracy in this great nation.
....
Being inspired by Christian principles and morals is different then being BASED on such things. You say you did not see any evidence which I found amusing since there were DIRECT QUOTES from people stating exactly what I was saying, but of course that must be some big lefty conspiracy. Has a politician ever said they were attempting to make this the "kingdom of god", of course not, that would be political suicide.

Let me say, again, they want application of OLD TESTAMENT LAW into our government. It first started getting big with a book by RJ Rushdoony in 1973 called the Institutes of Biblical Law. This is a group of theory that believe the only valid legislation, social theory, spiritual beliefs or economic theory are those derived from the bible.
In their views in accordance to old testament law people would be executed for committing adultery, blasphemy, heresy, homosexuality, idolatry, prostitution, witch craft and a few other things that would have you stoned or burned alive according to the old testament. If you can support those things, more power to you (though it would eliminate almost every politician republican or democrat all at once). The status of women would be reversed to where their rights would be less then those of men, since this is old testament law.

So your religion believes homosexuality, sex before marriage and the like is a sin. Who are you to impose YOUR religion on those who do not believe? Are we not a melting pot, where ALL can be equal? You keep mentioning Islam and this time Congressman Ellison, why is he or Islam a threat? I understand why RADICAL Islam is a threat, but by your comments I can only assume you see each and every Muslim as a threat. Just because something is written within a religious book doesn't mean every single follower believes that portion of it. Does every Christian believe they should stone an adulterous wife? Hell, the Catholics and Protestants basically have the same book and their not even the same religion. Sunni and Shia are two different sects of Islam, yet every Muslim is a threat? Stop living in fear of every single person who prays to Mecca. Not all of them want to blow up your family in the name of Allah, sure there are those who do, but not all of them do. For if they all did, then why do we even attempt to befriend the Iraqi people and rebuild their country?

I realize a good number of folks like you like do do revisionist history. What to think that this country was founded as a "Christian Nation" yet you forget about Article VI, which states that public officials shall be "bound by oath or affirmation to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States," basically taking the power of the church and setting up religious pluralism and the separation of church and state. Yes, the government was not supposed to get involved in religious matters, but religion was also not to take over governmental matters.
Rushdoony once wrote, "The Constitution was designed to perpetuate a Christian order," then asks rhetorically: "Why then is there, in the main, an absence of any reference to Christianity in the Constitution?" He argues that the purpose was to protect religion from the federal government and to preserve "states' rights."

Sadly RJ doesn't know history too well and ignores Article VI. Hell, many framers of the Constitution were strict Christians (as we noted prior) but it seems odd to me that a group so strict would do the exact opposite of what many try to claim. They became the first group that formed a government the had disestablishment, not only that WE INVENTED disestablishment. No other government in the history of man every created itself without the help of officially recognized gods and state connected ministers. Many colonies before 1787 had religious tests, allegiances and oaths to hold some kind of office, the Constitutional Convention however had very little debate over Article VI which unanimously passed article VI. Folks like you who believe this to be a "Christian Nation" think Article VI to not say or mean what it does say and mean. Which is simply the legal barrier against Christian theocracy and the invention of religious pluralism. If we were founded as you say, why would have they put up those barriers against a Christian theocracy?

As to appointing judges who are not religious, I don't care what their religion is. What I do care about is their interpretation of the law correctly without their own personal feelings getting in the way, much like Scalia does. I want my rights to be those guaranteed to me in the Constitution, not dictated to me by some religious book. One thing we can agree on is the Gods put us here with free will and I shall live my life with that and not under a boot of another person's religion.
A question was asked earlier that I would also address as I close. Someone asked me to name a terrorist group that was Christian, that part is easy, the Klu Klux Klan.